AN APPROACH TO ESTABLISHMENT OF TAMILNADU INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR (TANDICO) By LT GEN P R SHANKAR (RETIRED)
General
The Tamil Nadu Defence
Industrial Corridor Defence was inaugurated by our Defence Minister, on 20 Jan
2019. It comprises of industrial hubs in Chennai, Hosur, Salem, Coimbatore and
Tiruchirappalli. Next week, during the Tamil Nadu Global Investors Meet at Chennai,
aerospace and defence along with the defence corridor featured prominently. At the outset it is a great initiative and a laudable
step to achieve self-sufficiency in defence production. It was also great to participate
in a discussion with yesterday between some MSMEs and the Dassault team as to
how offsets can be discharged through the Corridor and how to prepare and train
for the future. However, it emerged that there were many blanks to be filled.
These need to be addressed for tangible realisation on ground and long-term
sustainability.
In order to establish the
Corridor, Ernst & Young have been hired to carry out an assessment and
submit a report. Why Ernst & Young? Cannot we do it on our own? For
instance during WW2, in the face of the German onslaught, Nikita Khrushchev
relocated a major part of Soviet arms industry East of Volga and had it up,
running and producing seriously huge war waging capacities to defeat the
Germans in three to four years flat. He did not have Ernst and Young! If
Microsoft, Google, IBM and others can use our brains to set up world class
facilities in India certainly I think we have enough capability within. Let’s leave it there and look ahead.
The Purpose
The
Corridor must serve a purpose which is well defined. In my opinion it must be
beyond achieving self-sufficiency in defence production or be an Aerospace and Defence
Industry hub. This corridor must be multipurpose in nature with dual use technologies
catering for needs of the Security, Defence, Aerospace and Disaster Management establishments
at national and International levels. Security represents the larger canvass. Climate change combined
with resource scarcity has brought disaster
management on par with Security. The
response mechanism and capabilities required for Security,
Defence, Aerospace and Disaster Management are similar. Militaries and societies are preparing
accordingly. Hence, Security, Defence, Aerospace and Disaster Management
must be treated as one compact and dealt
with from an industry view point.
Identity
An
enterprise of this nature requires an identity. The start point is a suggested
acronym - TANDICO (TAMILNADU DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR). Next
is to institute a suitable logo which can be designed in due course. Very importantly TANDICO must be a physical
interactive institution with an address, building and people. It must be an
autonomous body with an ability to execute the idea through a single-window,
single point of contact approach. The structure includes a HQ based in Chennai
with regional centres in Salem, Trichy, Coimbatore, Sivakasi and Hosur. Sivakasi
is the new entrant which is explained later. It should have a CEO dedicated to
furthering the Corridor. TANDICO must weld and hold together all the stake
holders in the system. At present this is sorely lacking and that came through
loudly during the interaction with Dassault. It must be understood that TANDICO cannot be run from South Block or Fort St George or by any industry body as is
being done now.
Stakeholders
and Structure
The
primary stakeholders in TANDICO are visualised to be the MOD, Govt of Tamil
Nadu, Industry, Consumers, Financial institutions and Knowledge Centres. A
structure of participation and work must be evolved with an equity model like
the TIDEL Park in Chennai so that it is a self-sustaining and growing body. It
should have an organisation and hierarchy suited to the purposes mentioned
earlier. MHA and NDMA must be incorporated as secondary stake holders in
TANDICO. At some stage ISRO and DAE will also have to be co-opted. All these
need mil grade or near mil grade sourcing.
Additional
Hub
Besides
existing hubs of TANDICO, Sivakasi the hub of fireworks industry should also be
included as a part of TANDICO. Sivakasi
needs to be converted into a source for explosive materials required for Defence
and Space purposes. With emphasis on environment, the fireworks industry is
facing a wind down. The resident structure and experience in handling
explosives should be reoriented towards national requirements of explosive and propulsion
material which is growing geometrically. It serves a social purpose besides
enhancing traditional expertise.
Role Definition
MOD. MOD must be the major
stake holder of this corridor. They will be the policy makers, enablers of TANDICO and its licencing and monitoring agency. They will have to set stage for it by
providing manufacturing benchmarks in scale and range, providing consumers and
markets with some degree of assurance, infusion of technologies, spurring export.
DRDO must be incorporated to provide research assistance. Armed Forces will
have to give direction and pointers to the Industry. In essence, MOD will be
the sheet anchor of TANDICO.
Tamil Nadu
Govt. Tamil Nadu Govt will be the hosting and executing
partner. They will provide basic infrastructure, deal with coordination and day
to day running of the corridor. They could also assist in providing consumer and
export related support. The state government must provide a conducive
environment for TANDICO to grow.
Industry. The industry will be the backbone of the corridor. Heavy defence
Industry in TN like OFB factories, BEL, L&T and Ashok Leyland will be the
showpiece industry. The bulk of the industry in TANDICO will be MSMEs. Industry
will also be represented by associations like CII, SIDM, FICCI, ASSOCHAM and
AIDAT. Effort must be made to get OEMs to set shop through the FDI route.
Knowledge and
Skilling Centres.
Knowledge centres in Tamil Nadu must be co-opted into the Corridor. This
include R&D establishments like CVRDE and CSIR labs as also Educational
institutes like IIT Madras, Anna University, NIT Trichy, and PSG Tech
Coimbatore for higher research and learning. Skilling and training centres must be
established to support the new emerging manufacturing and service industry. This
needs active participation and action by the Tamil Nadu Education Department.
Lot of tweaking must be done if the skilling centres are to be of international
standards. For example, knowledge of working English is mandatory in the
Aerospace Industry. The French hate this but have no choice. Tamil blue-collar
entrants to skilling have to be taught working level English as part of their
primary educational curriculum.
Incubation. IIT Madras and TIDEL Park, Chennai will have to establish an
incubation centre. This will make the Corridor vibrant in technology infusion
and promoting new ideas. Start-ups must be incubated and mentored specially in
emerging disruptive technologies to convert them into deployable weapon
systems. Also, forward area familiarisation and orientation programs must be
run for constituent members as part of the incubation process.
Testing and
Certification.
There will be a requirement to establish testing and certification facilities
for TANDICO. It is visualised that IIT Madras and TIDEL Park must evolve a
system to set up such a centre though the IIT Madras Research Park. Resources
can be drawn from under-utilised capacity of IIT Madras and new capacities
established by TANDICO which are complimentary to each other. IIT Madras is
already in the process of incubating a start up for this purpose. IIT Madras
with the experience it has in this field should should establish an accredited
Certification Centre.
R&D. It is also visualised that
a certain amount of R&D must commence in TANDICO with the assistance of
DRDO, ISRO, DAE, CSIR and IIT Madras. Currently it can commence with industrial
process research and later expand into certain niche areas. Might appear farfetched
but one must have a vision.
Avenues of Entry
and Sustainability
Avenues of
Entry. Industry in
the Corridor can enter the defence procurement environment through the capital or
revenue routes. While Tier1 industry will vie for major products, MSMEs need
facilitation to enter DRDO, OFB, DPSUs, OEMS, Base Work Shops, Ordinance
Depots, DGQA and Services as suppliers and Tier 2/ 3 contractors. A process of
entry must be defined for each route.
Incentivisation
and Sustainability.
TANDICO must be sustained through
incentives and assurances. Governments at state and central level can offer any
of the following incentives or many more to sustain TANDICO: -
• Govt owned
defense establishments across India can be mandated to source 4-5% of their
procurement budget from TANDICO.
• Government
can offer tax rebates / concessions to members of the Corridor.
• Export
oriented incentives should be held out.
• Assured
infrastructure can be earmarked in clusters.
Roles. All MSMEs can adopt one
or more of the following roles in the defence environment: -
• Technology partner
• Development partner
• Component supplier
• Material supplier
• Offset partner / global source partner
• Direct product sales or AMC partner
• Service Provider
• Skill / training Provider
Facilitation. Facilitation must be done
largely by MOD. Facilitation will be at multiple levels. At one level MOD must
harmonise the defence procurement and defence production imbalance. Procurement
drives production. Hence a certain amount of assured clairvoyance in procurement
must kick in. At another level a certain amount of revenue procurement,
sourcing by Tier 1 suppliers or sourcing for offset obligations from the TANDIC
must be mandated. Sustainability will be further facilitated by incorporating
MHA, NDMA, DAE, ISRO and other national players who will have a stake in the
TANDICO ecology. Their leverages should also contribute to strengthening TANDICO.
Conclusion
This is not an effort to reinvent the wheel
or a throw a red herring. This is an effort to reinforce the wheel set in
motion so that TANDICO becomes as a major national capacity multiplier in more
ways than one. It is also realised that this approach has holes and is sketchy.
It could also be said that it is too simplistic. For a start that’s how it can
be. Any comments- good , bad or ugly are
welcome so that they can be made use of to make TANDICO stronger.
Concept of an identity, with a name, location, logo etc for the Defence Corridor is an excellent idea. Indeed, as the popular adage foes, "If we continue to do things in the way we have been doing them, and expect different results, we are either fools or magicians".
ReplyDeleteCan TANDIC as an autonomous body even be accepted as a concept by the powers that be?
And who are these powers that be?
MOD at the Centre? Which Department at the Government of Tamilnadu? Industries? MSMEs?And within them, which sub department? SIPCOT?TIDCO? TIDEL Park?
Even as I write these lines, the incumbent Industries Secretary has been shifted to the more important (? RERA! We have had Seven Industries Secretary in the last three years!
As for the Industries bodies, the other old adage, "Success has many fathers, failure is an orphan'! is the most applicable. Except for AIDAT, which is the only Industry body focused only on Aerospace and Defence and that too only in Tamilnadu, the other big names, are multi disciplinary, Delhi driven, and media motivated.
How about Industry? How many of the Tamilnadu owned private sector Industry majors are even interested in defence?
Let us look at the fourth pillar - Academia. Tamilnadu boasts of the IITs, and NITs eta al, but how many institutions are there which are looking at churning out grass roots excellence in the defence domain?
And last but not least, how about the "end user" the armed Forces? Would they have a role to play in the proposed TANDIC? Should they have one? Will they be allowed to have one?
Yesterday's interaction with the Dassault team in Chennai was an eye opener. In my opinion, this team has done much more home work on the Tamil Nadu Defence Corridor, than any of the stake holders or decision makers, I have interacted with, since the corridor was announced with much fanfare in February last year, and with even greater fanfare when it was formally launched on 20th January this year at Trichy.
They have also already walked the talk in Maharashtra and Telengana (both of them, non corridor states).
Coming to the question raised by Gen Shankar, why E&Y to prepare a DPR for setting up the Industrial Corridors in UP and Tamilnadu?
In fact, AIDAT has facilitated stake holder interactions in Chennai and Trichy for E&Y.
How many of their recommendations would be relevant?
How many would be accepted by MOD?
Some thirty years ago, when the Indian Navy decided to go in for replacing their Foxtrot submarines with something more state of the art (at that time), NHQ created a project team consisting of only submariners, to evaluate not only the best options available worldwide , but also the most ideal shipyard in India to imbibe TOT and manufacture the submarines in India. The rest they say is history.
While generally concurring with all that Gen Shankar has to say about the TN Defence Industrial Corridor, I feel that one point the General has missed out is who is going to be the beneficiary of the Corridor?
ReplyDeleteIn my view, the prime Beneficiary should be the Indian Armed Forces who should get much needed systems, components etc, at costs and delivery schedules much better than what they are forced to import today. The Second beneficiary should be the MSMEs in the designated nodes of the defence Corridor who should not only get orders from the Armed Forces ( MOD does not place orders on MSMEs), but also receive payments in time, through implementation on the ground of the much vaunted simplified Defence Procurement (and Payment?) Procedures.
Gen Shankar made a very important point at the interaction with the Dassault team yesterday, which I would like to reiterate.
At a larger perspective, the Defence Corridor in Tamilnadu is not about only job creation, skill development, etc, which indeed it is.
The success of the Defence Corridor has greater and more
far reaching implications.
It concerns the current and emerging geo political situation.
We don't need the TIME magazine or BBC to tell us that the axes of action, economic, military and politics have shifted to the East.
If India has to justify its desire to be seated at the high table amongst the comity of nations, we must justify that desire. We can't do that by continuing to import 70% of our defence needs, even after 72 years of independence.
Gen Shankar also mentions the word "facilitation" by MOD. One way this can be achieved is by mandating by MOD, that some suitable percentage of the product of the Corridor has to be purchased by MOD/DPSUs/Ofs et al. Of course there would be some politically motivated hue and cry, as this could be construed to be against the interests of the non corridor states, but the decision makers must find a way around this.
thanks sir for your views
ReplyDeleteThe part about using homegrown talent is so right!
ReplyDeleteI believe we can draw parallels with the automotive industry for many things. Manufacturing can be improved if more small industries are set up with specialised capabilities to provide a certain type of component to product manufacturers.
Also for certification and accreditation either a separate organisation can be set up (like ARAI for automotive), or DRDO should be equipped with the facilities for testing and certification, and IIT Madras should help in setting this up. This also includes development of standards for the products.
DIO can setup an exclusive Defense incubator/accelerator in the corridor. This will allow the startups and companies alike to identify development partners or to absorb technologies.
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteThe concept is good . As Industries are wide And problem statements are complex . We should come with top 100 problem statements as Define by the MoD . We should then involve stakeholders to solve them .
We should encourage Indian high skill manpower like working in nasa etc to migrate and incentivize the ecosystem.
Excellent views sir.the state of Tamilnadu and the country as a whole will be benifiited by your participation in various activities there. Regards
ReplyDeleteThis is a well researched article but critical to its success is an autonomous body comprising of eminent members from the stakeholders. It should have minimal or no bureaucratic control. The Body should be headed by the Prime Minister to take off. RM, FM and Commerce Ministers and CM's of State/States should be part of the Body. CEO should be a real go getter(like Mr Sreedharan the Metro Man) and be made the Functional Head.
ReplyDeleteAdding Sivakasi in the Corridor will be brilliant
We need fast tracking like Delhi Metro to catch up with lost decades of no or minimal movement in developing Defence related indigenous industry
The above comments are by me
ReplyDeleteBrig Romesh Gupta (Retd)
Sir, the points raised by you in the article must be taken into consideration by policy makers since the success of such an ambitious project will much depend on its implementation with clear foresight and vision. The views are a reflection of your vast experience in modernisation projects of Artillery as well as clear understanding of policy matters. The Defence Parks being established in Kerala under MIIU scheme by KINFRA are also a welcome initiative in achieving self sufficiency in defence equipment and must take into account development of Knowledge and Incubation Centres by coopting IIT Palakkad, IISER etc to promote an R&D culture right from the start of this project.
ReplyDeleteHi , thanks for sharing your information.The insights are really helpful and informative. If anyone want to know about POLITICS, this will be the rightplace for you.
ReplyDeletePolitical Agency
Election management Company in India
I am contented glancing through this worthwhile information here. Without a doubt, this might be pertinent to a majority of apprentices. Continue sharing.
ReplyDeleteEnglish practice App | English speaking app