Skip to main content

Discussion on Failing Chinese Influence


This discussion is based on my article Waning of Chinese Influence . The topic is current and it flies in the face of conventional wisdom. However it is based on real examples where China has not been able to make headway in its global outreach. 

Comments

  1. Very wide ranging discussion that gives a bird's eye view of Chinese "state of the state".
    Looking forward to the next one

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you very much general for that wide ranging bird's eye view of the Chinese "state of the state".

    While the entire world seems to be pulling back on the relationship with the dragon I am sure the Chinese leadership would also be seeing it!

    Sitting at the checker boards plotting the next move?
    What could be that?

    Way back reading of the Chandal forces i had learnt that they habitually pause when the advance is not gathering the speed desired.
    They withdraw to regroup often to strike back.

    What could be that possibility? What is likely to be the dragon's weapon of revenge?

    Trust is one that you can never leave with them.

    Anything that the dragon touches meets a tragic end.

    Cautiously they have kept out of Afghanistan but how do they recoil from Sri Lanka where they are well invested?

    You did allude to the mystery of the rising trade between the two countries India and china. What should baffle us is the fact that despite the government's position so openly made the trade balance has adversely shifted in their favour. It continues to be so!

    I am sure you would be covering this aspect in your next talk.


    With so much money sunk in so many countries have they stretched too far?

    Is it the case of autocratic communism winding up the finishing stretch?

    Do you see a political upheaval anytime soon there?

    Thank you.
    Looking for the next one

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. China would like to establish a naval base in Sri Lanka. If the fees they are willing to pay is good then we will consider the proposal. India should make a good counter offer or the Chinese Navy will surround India.

      Delete
    2. Ha, ha, try another one.

      Delete
  3. Beautifully articulated and a very balanced view. However we should remember that in International Relations there are no permanent friends or enemies.

    Chinese have been utterly foolish dealing with India. Just for a few kms of land they have made India an enemy. Actually there are no other conflicting interest between India and China.

    May be in another 10 years China will realise that building strong bonds with India and Russia will give them a huge advantage in their International Prestige.

    India will also realise that the US and Europe will continue to treat us like poor aid seeking country and will twist our tail at every step with their support of Pakistan.

    We just need to remember that QUAD is not the only option we have.

    Narinder Modi realises this and I believe we will move that way slowly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Japan helped Communist gain power by
    destroying the Chinese Nationalist Army.
    USA helped China in its economic development to become second largest
    economy in the world.
    India helped China in conquering Tibet
    with its stupid idealistic foreign policy.
    Even USSR utterly failed in understanding
    China.
    It is premature to assess that Chinese
    power is declining or that it's iinfluence
    is waning
    By 1960 the Chinese economy is likely
    to grow to 65 Trillion dollars which will
    be almost equal to the combined economies
    Of USA, EU and Japan.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE POST BALAKOT REVIEW BY LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

The Pakistani FM to BBC: War would be suicidal. Pakistan has already started negotiating with a gun to its head! Welcome home Wing Commander Abhinanadan. Well done. You flew into the Valley of Death and survived.  India is proud. Sincere condolences to Air Marshal Waseem Ud Din on the loss of his son Shahaz Ud Din under most unfortunate circumstances. He was incredibly brave to continue his mission when others had turned around.   Paradigm Emerged A lot has happened since Balakot. Some in focus some out. Some hyped. Some diffused. Time to sum up the situation and see where things are heading. Militarily it is called Review of the Situation. I will do it journalistically so that the intellectual western media understands it. They might or not buy our story. Incidentally it is not a story. It is not for sale. This is real live action. Nuclear exchange receding. Not ruled out.     A fundamental paradigm has emerged. India’s fight is against terror. The D

GUNNERS SHOT HITS THE MILLION MARK

IT GIVES ME A GREAT SENSE OF PRIDE THAT ' GUNNERS SHOT ' HAS HAD ITS  'MILLIONTH VIEWER'  TODAY MORNING.  PLEASE SEE THE TABLE BELOW.                                 I STARTED THE BLOG IN MARCH 2019 WHEN SOME OF MY ARTICLES WERE REJECTED BY NATIONAL MEDIA AND REPUTED PLATFORMS. THEY PROBABLY FELT THAT MY  ARTICLES DO NOT DESERVE  SPACE IN THEIR PUBLICATIONS. HOWEVER I THANK THEM FOR NUDGING ME TO STRIKE OUT ON MY OWN.     SO I SET MY OWN STANDARDS.    I ALSO COULD NOT COMPROMISE IN PUTTING ACROSS MY VIEW POINT THE WAY I FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW. I CHOSE TO BE UNBIASED AND EXPRESS WHAT IS GOOD FOR INDIA WITHOUT ANY COLOURING.  I HAVE ALSO FELT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR EVERY INDIAN TO KNOW WHAT IS RELEVANT FOR OUR SECURITY IN AS SIMPLE TERMS AS POSSIBLE. IT IS ONLY THEN THAT HE WILL BE ABLE TO APPRECIATE AND SUPPORT THE ARMED FORCES IN THEIR ENDEAVOUR TO PROTECT OUR NATION. OUR MEN AND OFFICERS WHO ARE SERVING ARE THE BEST AND DESERVE OUR GRATITUDE FOR

A FRAMEWORK FOR DEFENCE INTERACTION WITH IITS By LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

This is an extension of my article  Defence Technology - An Indian Conundrum KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.  IT COMES FROM RESEARCH. RESEARCH GENERATES TECHNOLOGY . TECHNOLOGY OWNED IS CHEAP. TECHNOLOGY BOUGHT IS COSTLY From Oxymoronism to a Framework India lacks adequate defense technology. It needs to invest in defense R&D if it must be a power of reckoning. It needs to break its trader mentality. It needs need leadership and massive involvement of our academics in research. These oxymorons are well known. That is probably why the PM has asked the IITs to contribute by coming up with indigenous defense technologies. So far so good. How does one do it? That has been our zillion-dollar question. The fact that outsiders have been better at tapping our brain power and technological potential is also another oxymoron. Hence, I am shifting from pontificating to suggesting a framework on which this entire thought process should progress. So, let us begin with a SWOT