Skip to main content

China’s ‘Century of Humiliation’ Never Ended by Lt Gen P R Shankar (R)


Published in The Print @ China’s ‘Century of humiliation’ never ended. It needs a Mandela or Gandhi now


Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping—All of them have contributed to humiliating the Chinese people to keep CCP in power and achieve personal glory.

16 October, 2022 10:50 am IST

File Photo of Chinese President Xi Jinping casting his ballot during a vote on a constitutional amendment lifting presidential term limits, at the third plenary session of the National People's Congress (NPC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China 11 March, 2018 | Reuters

The narrative of the revenge on the ‘Century of Humiliation’, when China has suffered at the hands of foreign powers, will be blown-up at the 20th Communist Party Congress. There is a need to understand this aspect of the Communist thinking in its correct perspective. There is another ‘Century of Humiliation’ being heaped upon the Chinese people, which is completely buried under the Communist narrative.

The ‘Century of Humiliation (1839-1949)’ is the multifaceted period when the imperial government lost control over large portions of Chinese territory to foreigners. The Opium Wars represent one facet. In the First Opium War (1839-1842) British gunboats went up the Yangtze River and compelled Chinese rulers to open their ports and markets to the opium trade. During the Second Opium War (1856–1860), China fought against Britain and France. Superior European military technology prevailed over the weak Chinese forces. As a consequence, China was forced to sign unequal treaties to grant favourable tariffs, trade concessions, reparations and territory to the Europeans. It included parting with Hong Kong.

During the same century, China and Japan fought two wars. The Japanese military defeated the weaker Imperial forces in both wars and gained control over Taiwan and portions of Manchuria. Japan devastated and plundered China along the Yangtze basin. It resulted in about 15 million deaths and massive destruction of industrial infrastructure and agricultural production. Even today, the Chinese remember the brutal Rape of Nanjing in 1937 with dread. The other facets include massive rebellions in the early 1900s, when millions of people died. These uprisings were in opposition to the Chinese government and its capitulation to foreign demands. It led to the collapse of the imperial system in 1911. In this period Tibet, Mongolia, and Xinjiang declared independence to reduce China’s territory. The devastating Chinese civil war between the Communists and Nationalists is also part of the ‘Century of Humiliation.’

Also read: Xiconomics, The Fracture of a Chinese Dream

Mao’s People’s Republic of China

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) narrative portrays a loss of Chinese territory, a loss of control over its internal and external environment, and a loss of international standing and dignity during the ‘Century of Humiliation.’ This ended when Mao Zedong and the CCP established the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949. The ‘Century of Humiliation’ then taught the Chinese how strong powers behave towards weaker powers. It also taught them that if China falls weak, it will be laid to waste again. Based on this experience, the CCP wants China to grow so strong in the international arena that it can dominate all competing foreign powers. The narrative is also that the current international system is inimical to China. It should therefore use its growing influence to transform the existing system. The revenge on the ‘Century of Humiliation’ will be complete when a China-centric order is established and Taiwan is ‘reunited’ with the PRC.

The Chinese narrative is compelling when viewed in isolation. But it must be seen against a wider canvas. In the colonial period, events in China were no different from events in wide swathes of Asia, Africa and the Americas. However, what happened in the post-colonial period ever since the CCP came into existence in 1921 is unique to China.

The CCP has been dominated by three leaders—Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping. All of them have contributed to humiliating the Chinese people to keep CCP in power and achieve personal glory. They have subjected the Chinese people to unprecedented repression and humiliation in the name of progress. Their individual and collective track record is pathetic.

Great Leap Forward to Great Famine

Mao’s five-year plan, Great Leap Forward (1958-1962) intended to achieve economic greatness in a fraction of time while other nations took decades to accomplish the same. Mao established large-scale rural communes to solve China’s industrial and agricultural problems. They failed miserably. The Great Leap Forward created the Great Famine—the largest manmade famine in history. Mention of the famine is taboo in China to this day. It is called a period of Natural Disasters. When people starved to death, Mao did not even acknowledge the famine or initiate remedial action for nearly three years. He even refused to seek international aid. Mao’s worst acts of ‘commission’ were abolishing private food production, establishing mismanaged communes, and exporting food during the famine when people were starving. There are reports that people were driven to cannibalism. Ruling elites and people living in cities were ‘selectively provided’ with food. The death toll was around 45 million—equivalent to present day population of Argentina, Algeria, or Sudan. After that, Mao kept China in international isolation till 1972. Despite the ‘Great Leap’ failure, China went to war with India, Russia, and Vietnam in the subsequent period.

The decade long Cultural Revolution (1966 -1976) was launched by Mao to renew the spirit of the Chinese Revolution. Mao wanted to destroy the “four olds”—old ideas, old customs, old habits and old culture. His goals included, replacing designated successors with his loyalists, rectifying the Chinese Communist Party, providing China’s youths with revolutionary experience, and making the educational, health care, and cultural systems less elitist. In the process, schools and universities were closed. Churches, shrines, libraries, shops and private homes were ransacked or destroyed. His ‘Red Guards’attacked traditional and bourgeois values. Many party officials, elderly people, teachers, and intellectuals were publicly humiliated, abused or simply purged. The Cultural Revolution crippled the economy and ruined millions of lives. It resulted in a decade of turmoil, bloodshed, hunger and stagnation. If Chinese were ever humiliated, it was during this period.

Deng Xiaoping is credited for initiating the reforms and opening up the economy. He and his nominated successors Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao are acknowledged for making China rich and strong. However, it was under Deng that China’s One Child Policy was instituted in 1980 and executed ruthlessly. Forced contraception, sterilisation and abortions and stiff fines for non-compliance were the norm. It also led to female infanticide, skewed gender ratios and a generation of missing women. By the turn of the century, it was clear that the policy was a disaster. Yet it was wilfully continued till 2016 to consign China to the greatest demographic decline in human history. In doing so, they also laid the seeds of China’s irretrievable decline. The draconian One Child Policy is a singular act of humiliation of a people in perpetuity. The Chinese people have had the capacity to revive from Mao’s excesses. They will never recover from Deng’s One Child policy. It portends the decline of the Chinese nation.

Also read: 20th Party Congress : Likely outcomes   

Rehash of ‘China Dream’

Xi Jinping is a dyed-in-the-wool Communist who seeks to better Mao and become China’s greatest leader. He has sold an unattainable ‘China Dream’ to the country’s people. It is the equivalent to Mao’s Cultural Revolution. His premature declaration of victory over Covid and his politically motivated zero-covid policy has wrecked a thriving economy. He has managed to isolate China from the international community. He has incarcerated people of Xinjiang in concentration camps and has purged close to a million in his anti-corruption campaign. He intends to establish a China-centric world order through the greatest military in earth. He has jettisoned economic liberalisation, unbalanced material culture and wide inequity in favour of “State control”, “common prosperity, “a new model of win – win cooperation, “dual circulation” and a “revenge on the century of humiliation”. Under the garb of making China a strong, democratic, civilised, harmonious and modern socialist country the foremost global power by 2049, Xi Jinping is scripting his version of Great Leap Forward. Like Mao, he is also externalising through military assertion, particularly against Taiwan and India.

Without a doubt, the period 1839-1949 is a ‘Century of Humiliation’ of the Chinese people. However, the real humiliation started from 1921 when the CCP came to power and it is still going on. The CCP wants to avenge it but who will take revenge on the CCPs “Century of Humiliation” of the Chinese people? If ever, China needed a Gandhi, Mandela or a Martin Luther King, it is now.

Lt Gen P.R. Shankar (retd) is former DG Artillery and presently professor at the Aerospace department, IIT Madras. Views are personal.


Comments

  1. The problem of making "your face" paramount is that you cut corners in areas where you shouldn't. Being humble and egoless is actually a super power. This is THE ONE area of the Chinese mind that they CANNOT fix (till they crash & burn and are reborn).

    How do we exploit this - this inability to handle a loss of face...

    ReplyDelete
  2. General, you, are best in your written word & this format conveys your views better than a talk-video with x,y or zee. I hope you use this more often than the recent modes-communicaie ( my word)! If you do the video, then a complete transcript (duly screened by you) at the end of the interview would help gel the topic. Thanks,
    Captain Kiran Khankhoje IN Retd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks a lot for your comment Capt. I agree with you completely. I also feel good and very satisfied when I write. Let me see how to meld both the requirements. Good idea.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE POST BALAKOT REVIEW BY LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

The Pakistani FM to BBC: War would be suicidal. Pakistan has already started negotiating with a gun to its head! Welcome home Wing Commander Abhinanadan. Well done. You flew into the Valley of Death and survived.  India is proud. Sincere condolences to Air Marshal Waseem Ud Din on the loss of his son Shahaz Ud Din under most unfortunate circumstances. He was incredibly brave to continue his mission when others had turned around.   Paradigm Emerged A lot has happened since Balakot. Some in focus some out. Some hyped. Some diffused. Time to sum up the situation and see where things are heading. Militarily it is called Review of the Situation. I will do it journalistically so that the intellectual western media understands it. They might or not buy our story. Incidentally it is not a story. It is not for sale. This is real live action. Nuclear exchange receding. Not ruled out.     A fundamental paradigm has emerged. India’s fight is against terror. The D

GUNNERS SHOT HITS THE MILLION MARK

IT GIVES ME A GREAT SENSE OF PRIDE THAT ' GUNNERS SHOT ' HAS HAD ITS  'MILLIONTH VIEWER'  TODAY MORNING.  PLEASE SEE THE TABLE BELOW.                                 I STARTED THE BLOG IN MARCH 2019 WHEN SOME OF MY ARTICLES WERE REJECTED BY NATIONAL MEDIA AND REPUTED PLATFORMS. THEY PROBABLY FELT THAT MY  ARTICLES DO NOT DESERVE  SPACE IN THEIR PUBLICATIONS. HOWEVER I THANK THEM FOR NUDGING ME TO STRIKE OUT ON MY OWN.     SO I SET MY OWN STANDARDS.    I ALSO COULD NOT COMPROMISE IN PUTTING ACROSS MY VIEW POINT THE WAY I FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW. I CHOSE TO BE UNBIASED AND EXPRESS WHAT IS GOOD FOR INDIA WITHOUT ANY COLOURING.  I HAVE ALSO FELT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR EVERY INDIAN TO KNOW WHAT IS RELEVANT FOR OUR SECURITY IN AS SIMPLE TERMS AS POSSIBLE. IT IS ONLY THEN THAT HE WILL BE ABLE TO APPRECIATE AND SUPPORT THE ARMED FORCES IN THEIR ENDEAVOUR TO PROTECT OUR NATION. OUR MEN AND OFFICERS WHO ARE SERVING ARE THE BEST AND DESERVE OUR GRATITUDE FOR

A FRAMEWORK FOR DEFENCE INTERACTION WITH IITS By LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

This is an extension of my article  Defence Technology - An Indian Conundrum KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.  IT COMES FROM RESEARCH. RESEARCH GENERATES TECHNOLOGY . TECHNOLOGY OWNED IS CHEAP. TECHNOLOGY BOUGHT IS COSTLY From Oxymoronism to a Framework India lacks adequate defense technology. It needs to invest in defense R&D if it must be a power of reckoning. It needs to break its trader mentality. It needs need leadership and massive involvement of our academics in research. These oxymorons are well known. That is probably why the PM has asked the IITs to contribute by coming up with indigenous defense technologies. So far so good. How does one do it? That has been our zillion-dollar question. The fact that outsiders have been better at tapping our brain power and technological potential is also another oxymoron. Hence, I am shifting from pontificating to suggesting a framework on which this entire thought process should progress. So, let us begin with a SWOT