Skip to main content

The Falling Trajectory of a Rising China by Lt Gen P R Shankar (R)


Published in the The Sunday Guardian @ The falling trajectory of a rising China


This is a follow up of my article The Xi Of Everything

Mr Xi Jinping, the Chairman of Everything and Dictator for Life will not only preside over the biggest demographic decline in mankind but will also preside over the biggest loss of human capital in his lifetime.


Many Indian veterans opine that China,  being the second largest economy in the world, is a rising power. It will dominate the world as it vies for global supremacy. However if one looks beyond this simplistic view, there is also a clear sense of a nation under siege. If the communist grandstanding is ignored, the ‘on ground’ reality indicates a decline.  In this confusing scenario, one needs to understand China’s current and future trajectory to handle it well. However it is also important to remember, as they say in mutual fund advertisements – past performance is no guarantee of future results. It applies to China also. 

 

Also Read China: Drought, Danger and Decline

 

For more than a month, we have been sucked into this huge political soap opera called the  20th Party Congress. We witnessed a dictator  self-anointing himself for life and surrounding himself with ‘chamchas’ as we understand the term in India. The fanfare and  media hype did not mask the hollowness of the event. We now know that China, the CCP and one man have been rolled into as the ‘Xi of Everything’. This ruthless autocrat has grandiose ambitions. However his ideological bluster was short on substance. If anything , the event highlighted  that China faces an uncertain future filled with huge risks for which no mitigation plan is in sight. As The Xi himself put it, there are black swan and grey rhino events on the horizon. What are these? We will get to them by answering a set of questions.

 


 

How does China rise when its GDP is slowing down significantly?

 

It’s the economy stupid! This phrase mattered most to Chinese from the days of Deng Xiaoping. It was the antidote to Mao’s great backward leaps. The economy was clocking double digit growth consistently. Private sector unicorns  like Alibaba and Tencent led growth alongside debt based infrastructure investment. Then, ‘The Xi’ took over in 2012. He yanked hard left and the economy started declining. He sought growth through public debt financing by Chinese owned banks and large state-owned enterprises. Debt rose and returns on investment declined. Soon, labour force decline set in and productivity growth slowed down sharply. Boosting  productivity is important as demographics decline. It is the only way to keep China’s growth engine going. However zero covid policy, increasing  unemployment, dwindling private sector and an inefficient public sector do not contribute to increased productivity. The Xi Jinping rate of growth very much like the Hindu rate of growth, has only been going down since 2012(see graphic). To amplify it further, about a year back, at the onset of real estate troubles, a Chinese economist had then stated that ‘the day when China’s economy overtakes the US economy is going further away and not getting nearer’. Recently an article in Financial Times stated that ‘the Chinese economy is unlikely to overtake the US economy till 2060, if ever’. Had China’s growth continued on the earlier trajectory (under Hu Jintao) rather than slowing by nearly 3-5 % under Xi Jinping, the Chinese economy today would have been about 25- 40%  larger. Do these facts portend China’s rise?

 

Also Read : The Xi of Everything

 

How does China rise in an era of  deglobalisation?

 

China joined the WTO and dived deep into globalisation. Its economy took off in a golden era of rapid economic growth and increased international clout. Globalisation meant unrestricted cross-border flows of goods and services including finance, information, technology, intellect, and labour. China, the greatest beneficiary of globalisation, became the global manufacturer of everything. However, the 2008 global financial crisis and Covid-19 slowed down global trade and globalisation. The US China trade war, pandemic blues,  wolf warriorism and self-isolationism by China, disrupted globalisation. Pandemic-related supply chain disruptions, geostrategic economic re-alignments,  Xi’s assertiveness and the Ukraine war, reversed globalisation. Most importantly, global inflation dampened demand. China’s debt trap diplomacy and BRI also contributed further to this effect. China’s access to cutting edge technologies is also being severely curtailed by US and European policy makers.  Chinese imports and exports are dipping in this period of deglobalisation. In such a situation, will China continue to rise?


Also Read : China’s Century of Humiliation


How does China rise without core technologies?

 

The rise of any nation is predicated on its technological prowess. For all the hype on technology advancement in China there have been only five Nobel Laureates who were Chinese citizens at the time they were awarded their prizes. One of them was a human rights activist! The last one was awarded a Nobel Prize in 2015. China lacks core technologies in seeds to guarantee its food security. Xi Jinping repeatedly exhorts his scientists to make the country self-sufficient in seed technology. It has not happened so far. China also lacks technology to produce aircraft engines for its fighter or transport aircraft. It is in a tight corner for semiconductor technology. Its effort at self-sufficiency in semiconductors is a path strewn with financial scams by political tricksters. Most spectacularly, its disastrous Zero-covid policy is due to ineffective indigenous vaccine technology. China’s technology adoption is largely through intellectual theft and copy catting. It has not been inventive in creating technologies. In the 20th  Party Congress,  Xi made a call for ‘developmental security’. He is pressing to promote integrated development of ‘strategic emerging industries’ and grow ‘a new group of growth engines’ that include information technology, artificial intelligence (AI), new energy sectors, biotech, new materials, advanced equipment and green products. Xi Jinping has nominated many technocrats to the central committee to deliver on ‘technology’.   Xi wants China to promote ‘new types of industrialisation’ and to become a powerful country in ‘manufacturing high-quality goods, space exploration, transport, cyberspace and digitalisation’. These aspirations are to be realised through state led enterprise.  Therein lies the huge question mark. The vibrant private big tech sector which made China into an economic powerhouse has been emasculated. 



 

How does China rise without people?

 

Till 2019, the estimate was that China’s population would peak at 1.45 billion in 2031. Suddenly and mysteriously , it is now revealed in 2022 , that the population has peaked. It has occurred 10 years before it was supposed to arrive. The demographic bomb is not in future. It is here and now,  as the steep decline in China’s population has commenced.  Simultaneously, China is aging rapidly. By 2030 it would have lost 10 million working population and added 50 million aged people. By 2040, it would have lost 60 million working population and added 340 million aged people. This decline is irreversible despite the ‘two child’ and ‘three child’ formula. There are not enough women in a society which has been practising gender selection and female infanticide for over two generations now. Population boosting strategies are destined to fail (and have failed). The decline in China’s working-age population is irreversible. It sets the stage only for  lower economic growth, unless productivity increases (which is actually decreasing). Higher costs of the rapidly shrinking labour force, is already pushing low-margin, labour-intensive manufacturing out of China. There is something more damaging. In 2021, 10.62 million babies were born. These children will enter college around 2039-2040.  In 2022, 10.67 million college students graduated. By 2039-2040 the college graduates will slowly reduce to only 5-6 million annually. Mr Xi Jinping, the Chairman of everything and the dictator for life will not only preside over the biggest demographic decline in mankind but will also preside over the biggest loss of human capital in his life time. The reality facing China is simple. It WILL lose in one generation what it took three generations to build. The effect of this irreversible decline should be palpable in about 3-5 years.


 

Also Read : Xiconomic Fracture of a China Dream

How does China rise without investment, meritocracy or trust?

 

China’s quarterly GDP figures were released after the 20th Party Congress. A reasonable 3.9%  growth was indicated. However Chinese stocks were sold in panic to hit a 13 year low. The Chinese Yuan hit a low last seen in 2008. This reaction was due to the major reshuffle of China’s leadership, falling exports, cooling of retail sales, reduced imports, and patchiness of the GDP data. Internationally, Chinese equities are becoming 'uninvestable'.  Investors lack confidence in the future of the Chinese economy. Economic policy is entirely dependent on the political aspirations of Xi alone. There are no checks and balances to his power. The Politburo Standing Committee, is stacked with his loyal men rather than people of merit.  Lack of transparency, weak accounting standards, and poor regulatory oversight add to this problem. Additionally, conflicts which China is enmeshed in ,are also driving down investor sentiment. These include a spat with USA for global domination and contending its sanctions on advanced technologies,  obsession with military annexation of Taiwan, frictions in the South China Sea, border problems with India, human-rights abuses in Xinjiang and China’s unlimited partnership with Russia. At the end of the day there is a trust deficit about China.

 

Also Read : Ailing China on a Decline

 

The Future Trajectory

 

The 20th Party Congress did outline the shape of China’s future trajectory. It was all about reunification of the Chinese nation by annexing Taiwan and rejuvenation of the Chinese dream  in the face of “unparalleled complexity,” “graveness,” “Black swan and gray rhino events” and the “difficulty” that China faces at home and abroad. The ‘Xi Thought’ places  ideology, national security and state control above economic growth. There is a willingness to pay the price for it. The commitment to a zero covid was reiterated. Common prosperity, dual circulation, and anti-corruption policies would , firmly get China back on the growth track. Xi also spoke of “Having the courage to fight and the fortitude to win” and “make our party invincible.”

 

What is rising in China?  It is ideology, national security, state control, zero covid and its over sized military. Which part of China’s trajectory is dipping? In the short run it is its sluggish economy, globalisation, lack of technology and the ‘only point’ leadership. In the long run it is the demography. As the short term issues are playing out, the long term demographics have  started catching  China flat footed. The good old ‘Gun boat diplomacy’ is the only way to reverse this process and open up pathways for economic revival. The Gun is therefore out. The greatest and most modern military on earth is therefore on a warpath to win  local, regional and reunification wars in order to establish a Xi Centric world order. It is time India watches out. 

Comments

  1. Sir, I found the first pic (China's GDP over time) VERY interesting. Here's one more point you might want to consider.

    This perspective is based on the following observations on this graph:
    a. pre-Jin Ping the GDP growth was much more chaotic (but kept on rising).
    b. Post-Jin Ping taking over, this fluctuation has been dampened (and has been dropping).

    in '92 Hyman Minsky https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyman_Minsky wrote a paper: The financial instability hypothesis: https://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp74.pdf - essentially he said some amount of instability and chaos actually breeds stability and if instability vanishes then people take higher and higher risks leading to what he called a Minsky Moment: https://www.economist.com/schools-brief/2016/07/30/minskys-moment .

    Paul Krugman, the Nobel Laureate agreed with his hypothesis.

    To my mind the underlying causes of such a major financial crash, Minsky moment lies in the societial eco-system (one such was the US 2007, there were many, many more in the past). Your article brings out a similar reasons why a Minsky moment can happen. Indeed there are others who give similar reasons:
    https://www.northerntrust.com/united-states/insights-research/2021/weekly-economic-commentary/china-confronts-minsky
    https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets/moneycontrol-pro-weekender-chinas-minsky-moment-9093731.html

    In fact, I would contrast them with the Indian societal ecosystem. There's continuously some chaos, stuff bubbling up in India. IMHO, this is ACTUALLY our strength - the chances of a Minsky moment for us reduce.

    Hope this is useful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments and the links which you provided. Extremely informative. I am no economist. However I have studied china from a broader perspective. Things do not add up. When a country with a perceptible decline in population starts demolishing multi-storey buildings and yet resorts to risky debt fuelled investment, then there is something seriously wrong. It is entering a zone of instability. one has to see where it goes. economic instability could turn into serious military instability. Thanks for your erudite comments once again.

      Delete
    2. Thank you Sir. I'm no economist either - this is just background reading/absorbing over the years.

      One more thought around this is the correlation of the above with the growing global instabilities (Ru-Ukr, rise of militant Islam, US/EU/West slowdown, instabilities elsewhere, BRI failure etc., etc.,). All these hit their export led growth (and all said and done, China's growth is primarily export led). Coupled with the other headwinds makes it inevitable that they will slow down. In fact, for them a globalized world will be a pretty sharp talwar that will cut deeply.

      Re: economic/military instability: IMHO as China drains money, it won't hit the military immediately as they would have buffered the Armed Forces and kept a budget for them. But given the long term down trend in GDP (the GDP graph above) + multiple other headwinds, they are going to find it difficult to keep to the same levels of funding. This will first wipe out their research efforts (always the first to be axed) and then operational needs.

      However, I suspect they will ACT (to preserve face + last bites of a dying snake ++) WHILE they still have the money/capability. (my take) While prima facie the priorities seem to be Taiwan & then India, I suspect it might be India first (your reasons why Taiwan will be tough make eminent sense) because it will be easier to establish face (their memories of '62 etc., etc.,) as they go. And this time I suspect, they will throw everything at us.

      I think we must prepare for that inevitability.

      Thank you for your articles/videos Sir, they help build a integrated geo-strategic picture of our neighborhood.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE POST BALAKOT REVIEW BY LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

The Pakistani FM to BBC: War would be suicidal. Pakistan has already started negotiating with a gun to its head! Welcome home Wing Commander Abhinanadan. Well done. You flew into the Valley of Death and survived.  India is proud. Sincere condolences to Air Marshal Waseem Ud Din on the loss of his son Shahaz Ud Din under most unfortunate circumstances. He was incredibly brave to continue his mission when others had turned around.   Paradigm Emerged A lot has happened since Balakot. Some in focus some out. Some hyped. Some diffused. Time to sum up the situation and see where things are heading. Militarily it is called Review of the Situation. I will do it journalistically so that the intellectual western media understands it. They might or not buy our story. Incidentally it is not a story. It is not for sale. This is real live action. Nuclear exchange receding. Not ruled out.     A fundamental paradigm has emerged. India’s fight is against terror. The D

GUNNERS SHOT HITS THE MILLION MARK

IT GIVES ME A GREAT SENSE OF PRIDE THAT ' GUNNERS SHOT ' HAS HAD ITS  'MILLIONTH VIEWER'  TODAY MORNING.  PLEASE SEE THE TABLE BELOW.                                 I STARTED THE BLOG IN MARCH 2019 WHEN SOME OF MY ARTICLES WERE REJECTED BY NATIONAL MEDIA AND REPUTED PLATFORMS. THEY PROBABLY FELT THAT MY  ARTICLES DO NOT DESERVE  SPACE IN THEIR PUBLICATIONS. HOWEVER I THANK THEM FOR NUDGING ME TO STRIKE OUT ON MY OWN.     SO I SET MY OWN STANDARDS.    I ALSO COULD NOT COMPROMISE IN PUTTING ACROSS MY VIEW POINT THE WAY I FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW. I CHOSE TO BE UNBIASED AND EXPRESS WHAT IS GOOD FOR INDIA WITHOUT ANY COLOURING.  I HAVE ALSO FELT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR EVERY INDIAN TO KNOW WHAT IS RELEVANT FOR OUR SECURITY IN AS SIMPLE TERMS AS POSSIBLE. IT IS ONLY THEN THAT HE WILL BE ABLE TO APPRECIATE AND SUPPORT THE ARMED FORCES IN THEIR ENDEAVOUR TO PROTECT OUR NATION. OUR MEN AND OFFICERS WHO ARE SERVING ARE THE BEST AND DESERVE OUR GRATITUDE FOR

A FRAMEWORK FOR DEFENCE INTERACTION WITH IITS By LT GEN P R SHANKAR (R)

This is an extension of my article  Defence Technology - An Indian Conundrum KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.  IT COMES FROM RESEARCH. RESEARCH GENERATES TECHNOLOGY . TECHNOLOGY OWNED IS CHEAP. TECHNOLOGY BOUGHT IS COSTLY From Oxymoronism to a Framework India lacks adequate defense technology. It needs to invest in defense R&D if it must be a power of reckoning. It needs to break its trader mentality. It needs need leadership and massive involvement of our academics in research. These oxymorons are well known. That is probably why the PM has asked the IITs to contribute by coming up with indigenous defense technologies. So far so good. How does one do it? That has been our zillion-dollar question. The fact that outsiders have been better at tapping our brain power and technological potential is also another oxymoron. Hence, I am shifting from pontificating to suggesting a framework on which this entire thought process should progress. So, let us begin with a SWOT